Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy

By P. Hall, Daniel W. Gingerich. 2004

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc474c37b140e15638a35c4e70cbe956c3ce8f89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety (2007, background): “Hall and Gingerich (2004) made an excellent effort to measure the effects of institutional complementarities identified in the Hall and Soskice’ framework.”
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations (2007, background): “…research on institutional complementarities has tended to rely on case studies or smaller samples of countries (e.g., Albert, 1993; Hollingsworth & Boyer, 1997; Whitley, 1999), and the empirical testing of larger samples is only beginning to emerge (e.g., Amable, 2000; Hall & Gingerich, 2004).”
Cultural and Individual Value Correlates of Capitalism: A Comparative Analysis (2007, background): “Empirical data indicate that ACC represents a polar type on a continuum of capitalisms (Hall and Gingerich, 2004).”
The determinants of tax haven FDI (2016, methodology): “In order to overcome this difficulty we adopt the empirical analysis of Hall and Gingerich (2009) who construct two indices based on labour relations and corporate governance and then estimate a regression model between the two.”
Perceived job quality in the United States, Great Britain, Norway and West Germany, 1989-2005 (2010, methodology): “The VoC approach has been helpful in explaining outcomes such as cross-country differences in economic performance (Hall and Gingerich, 2004).”
De facto independence after delegation: A fuzzy‐set analysis (2007, methodology): “The index created by Hall and Gingerich (2004) allowed us to measure the degree of coordination between national economies in Western countries (coordeco) on a seven-point scale that also relies upon our substantive knowledge of each case (Hall & Soskice 2001).”
Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance (2006, methodology): “…growth and employment growth among these 18 countries over the period 1974–2000 appear to offer little, if any, support for the notion that institutional coherence—as conceptualized by Hall and Soskice (2001) and Hall and Gingerich (2004)—has contributed to healthy macroeconomic performance.3”
Economic Sociologies in Space (2005, background): “Expressing a perhaps surprising degree of deference to the methodological routines and theoretical priorities of orthodox economics, Hall and Gingerich (2001, 3–4) constructed their case in the following way: The varieties of capitalism approach draws a distinction between two modes of coordination.”
The Varieties of Capitalism and Hybrid Success (2007, background): “…impressed by the fact that even Kenworthy (2006), who is a critic of the varieties of capitalism approach and who has a better coding scheme than Hall and Gingerich (2004), agreed with how they have coded these three countries as being substantially higher in institutional coherence and,…”
Capitalist diversity and diversity within capitalism (2009, background): “In contrast, the landmark study of heterogeneity between institutional domains by Hall and Gingerich (2004) came to the opposite conclusion.”