Aesthetics and the online shopping environment: Understanding consumer responses
By Yong J. Wang, Michael S. Minor, Jie Wei. 2011
363 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc2d83e3805e52ffd1492a118fd3589d0fbb6153
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Kim K. P. Johnson
- Angella J. Kim
- Benedikt Schnurr
- Chen-Yi Peng
- René Eppmann
- Nicola E. Stokburger‐Sauer
- Alexandra Brunner-Sperdin
- G. Mortimer
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Benedikt Schnurr
- Chen-Yi Peng
- René Eppmann
- Nicola E. Stokburger‐Sauer
- Alexandra Brunner-Sperdin
- G. Mortimer
- Lynda Andrews
- Jillian D. Martin
Citations in the corpus
- Re-examining online customer experience to include purchase frequency and perceived risk (2015, background): “Aesthetics are part of an e-tailer’s atmospherics that rely on the quality of colour, graphics and layout that predict shoppers’ affective experiential states in online shopping contexts (Manganari et al., 2009; McKinney, 2004; Perea y Monsuwé et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2011).”
- Gameful Experience in Gamification: Construction and Validation of a Gameful Experience Scale [GAMEX] (2018, background): “…towards the mineral water brand ( α = .92; Aylesworth and MacKenzie 1998; Keller 1991), as well as their intentions to purchase the brand ( α = .82; Baker and Churchill 1977), revisit the website ( α = .97; Wang, Minor, and Wei 2011), and engage in positive word-of-mouth ( α = .85; Gelbrich 2011).”
- The effect of context attractiveness on product attractiveness and product quality: the moderating role of product familiarity (2017, methodology): “In line with previous literature (Cai and Xu 2011; Wang et al. 2011), we manipulated the websites’ classical aesthetics by varying the logical organization of different website elements as well as the legibility of font type.”
- Application of the Stimuli-Organism-Response (S-O-R) Framework to Online Shopping Behavior (2014, background): “Consistent with extant studies, the model considers hedonic and utilitarian shopping values internal motivations (e.g., McKinney 2004; O’Brien 2010), and treats the web environment as an external influence in the stimulus stage (e.g., Wang et al. 2011).”
- Sensory stimulation for sensible consumption: Multisensory marketing for e-tailing of ethical brands (2019, background): “customers’ online brand experience in the face of heightened competition in e-tailing (Wang et al., 2011); particularly given the difficulties in differentiating ethical products based on functional attributes (Pancer et al.”
- Power of consumers using social media: Examining the influences of brand-related user-generated content on Facebook (2016, methodology): “Researchers utilizing the SeOeR model in online settings have found purchase intention (Eroglu et al., 2003; Koo & Ju, 2010; Peng & Kim, 2014; Wang et al., 2010, 2011) and intention to engage in WOM activities (Ha & Im, 2012) to be linked to UGC.”