Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems.

By L. Talmy. 2000

803 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dba93248ddd79d187443875f051f102fe7f8d64d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce (2007, background): “Talmy (2000a) argues at length that clause-taking P in English (what traditional grammars call ‘subordinating conjunctions’; cf. Huddleston and Pullum 2002 for discussion) like because, despite, while and so on take Ground complements, essentially as sketched in (63) (cf. Talmy 2000a, ch. 6).”
Causal reasoning with forces (2015, background): “2The availability of a construal that highlights just the initial and final elements of causal chain has been referred to in the linguistics literature as windowing of attention (Talmy, 2000).”
Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German* (2010, background): “He suggested that languages can be categorized into two types on the basis of where they characteristically express Path (Talmy, 1985, 2000a, b).”
Usage‐Based Language: Investigating the Latent Structures That Underpin Acquisition (2013, background): “In language comprehension, abstract linguistic constructions (like locatives, datives, and passives) guide the listener’s attention to a particular perspective on a scene while backgrounding other aspects (Langacker, 1987; Talmy, 2000; Taylor, 2002).”
What triggers the emergence of grammar (2013, background): “Because the world consists of dynamically changing situations, classified as events, the object and event recognition system that maintains the world model is strongly related to other research on visual event classification [29], [18], temporal world modeling [1], and the conceptual analysis of eve”
The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. (2013, methodology): “Our approach relies on a classification system that grows out of linguistic, cognitive, and neuroscientific investigation (Chatterjee, 2008; Palmer, 1978; Talmy, 2000).”
Task Complexity, Focus on L2 Constructions, and Individual Differences: A Classroom-Based Study. (2011, methodology): “For resource-directing dimensions, in line with insights drawn from cognitive linguistics (Talmy, 2000) and first language (L1) acquisition (Cromer, 1974), Robinson predicts that more complex monologic tasks will lead to both greater accuracy and complexity.”
Cognitive Complexity and Task Sequencing: Studies in a Componential Framework for Second Language Task Design (2005, background): “Cognitive linguistics, and the framework within which Talmy (2000) works, and which I described, may well offer further insight into how such measures may be developed, and operationalized (see Robinson and Ellis, to appear).”
The Pragmatics of Spatial Language (2016, background): “Space is continuous, language is discrete, and spatial language is coarse and limited—built from a restricted and closed class of spatial prepositions (Talmy, 1983, 2000; Landau & Jackendoff, 1993) such as “in,” “on,” and “near.””
Task-Based Language Learning (2011, background): “By increasing complexity along these dimensions, initially implicit knowledge of the L1 concept-structuring function of language (see Talmy, 2000) becomes gradually explicit and available for change during L2 production.”
Evolving grounded communication for robots. (2003, background): “(3) Research in cognitive semantics [ 32 ] has yielded intriguing descriptions of the kinds of conceptualizations humans employ for language.”
Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper (2009, neutral): “1, December 2009, pp. 1–26 10 (Talmy, 2000).”