Fair and square: the four sides of distributive justice

By James Konow. 2001

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db8ca51b146465fa4091fd2355b512e2c10c1b74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Fair Air: Distributive Justice and Environmental Economics (2010, background): “Hence, the question “What is fair?” is sometimes the same as the question “What is right?” or “What is good?” In other cases, it signifies something more specific, whereby there is survey evidence that the most specific sense of fairness is equivalent to accountability alone (Konow 2001).”
Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories (2003, background): “…indicates that more evenly divided responses are due, not to major divisions of opinion among respondents, but rather to the fact that the views of most are close to indifference between the response categories (e.g., see the results of question 8 in Konow 2001; see footnote 11 for other reasons).”
Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach (2010, background): “The concept of equity is strongly associated with the ideas of fairness and justice (Konow, 2001), and sometimes it is hard to differentiate them.”
A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness (2007, background): “3 Konow (2001) elaborates an objective theory of m 0 as a function of the agent’s relative actual effort levels (“accountability”), the efficient effort levels, the agents’ basic material needs, and the context.”
Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy (2008, unknown): “Individuals who are unemployed are much less happy than others, even when such influences as lower income are controlled for (e.g. Clark and Oswald 1994; Winkelmann and Winkelmann 1998; Clark et al. 2001).”
Empirical Social Choice (2011, background): “Pareto efficiency gets more pronounced in the following situation also considered in Konow (2001).”