Economic Fundamentals of the Knowledge Society

By Paul A. David, Dominique Foray. 2003

362 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db5643e2325f5eb55affcc253c4cbe5e848cdb77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society (2013, background): “…different sectors of activity, approach to intellectual property rights and the privatisation of knowledge, as well as the approach of trust, memory and the fragmentation of knowledge (David and Foray, 2003) make an important difference between the singleand multi-sphere (hybrid) institutions.”
Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence (2013, neutral): “One of the main features of the knowledge-based economy is the importance of international networks through which pertinent knowledge flows (Lundvall, 1998, David and Foray, 2002).”
Strategic Entrepreneurs at Work: The Nature, Discovery, and Exploitation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities (2007, background): “The economic school attributes the existence of entrepreneurial opportunities to the distribution of information regarding material opportunities in society (Arrow, 1962; David and Foray, 2003).”
Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links (2006, background): “In recent years a considerable body of work has been developed to understand and explain this shift towards a knowledge-based economy (OECD, 1996; Dunning, 2000; David & Foray, 2002, 2003) or a learning economy (Lundvall & Johnson, 1994; Lundvall & Borrás, 1999; Archibugi & Lundvall, 2002).”
Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions (2008, background): “Since personal interactions are sensitive to increasing distance (David and Foray, 2003), it is argued that spatial proximity favors knowledge exchange, knowledge spillovers and innovation relationships.”