Why travel to the FIFA World Cup? Effects of motives, background, interest, and constraints

By N. Kim, L. Chalip. 2004

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db2c3665b6f74798c82e3109b3e65ab668b1e995

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Planning a wine tourism vacation? Factors that help to predict tourist behavioural intentions (2007, positive): “For instance, in related research domains (see Kim & Chalip, 2004; Smith, 1987), barriers or constraints to travel have included financial (lack of money), knowledge (lack of full understanding), health (personal state), distance needed to travel to the destination, and risk (health and safety).”
How Visitors and Locals at a Sport Event Differ in Motives and Identity (2008, methodology): “This notion has intuitive appeal, and there is evidence that the willingness of sport fans to undertake travel to an event does depend somewhat on their fan motivation (Kim & Chalip, 2004).”
Factors Affecting Repeat Visitation and Flow-on Tourism as Sources of Event Strategy Sustainability (2009, background): “Mastery motivation was not considered to be relevant to spectators at the event (Kim & Chalip, 2004), so was not included in this study.”
The Effects of Personal Values on Travel Motivation and Behavioral Intention (2012, background): “Previous studies of travel motivation have focused either on examining the specific motivations that prompt people to take certain types of vacation (e.g., N. Kim and Chalip 2004) or on the employment of motivation as a means of modeling market segmentation (e.g., Bieger and Laesser 2002).”
The Impact of Constraints on Motivation, Activity Attachment, and Skier Intentions to Continue (2011, background): “…motivation have been consistently shown in the literature to be important factors in an individual’s decision making for leisure participation (Alexandris & Stodolska, 2004; Armitage & Conner, 1999; Bansal & Eiselt, 2004; Iso-Ahola, 1989; Kim & Chalip, 2004; Kyle, Absher, Hammitt, & Cavin, 2006).”
Destination Image and Intent to Visit China and the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games (2008, background): “…suggested that hallmark and mega events can act as imagebuilders for modern tourism as their primary function is to provide the host community with an opportunity to secure high prominence in the tourism marketplace (Brown, Chalip, Jago, & Mules, 2004; Hall, 1989b; Kim & Chalip, 2004; Roche, 1994).”
Effects of Travel Motivation, Past Experience, Perceived Constraint, and Attitude on Revisit Intention (2009, background): “…constraint negotiation as a construct intermediate between perceived constraint and leisure participation and argued that the constraint negotiation process can explain why more constraint does not necessarily mean less participation (e.g., Crompton and Kim 2004; Hubbard and Mannell 2001).”
Why do you cruise? Exploring the motivations for taking cruise holidays, and the construction of a cruising motivation scale (2011, background): “Despite the vast amount of attention that tourism scholars have paid to studying travel motivation (e.g., Dann, 1977; Iso-Ahola, 1982; Crompton, 1979; Kim & Chalip, 2004), little effort has been paid to studying travel motivation in the context of cruise tourism.”
Perceptions of Risk and Travel Intentions: The Case of China and the Beijing Olympic Games (2009, methodology): “Kim & Chalip (2004) in a study of US soccer club members and their interest and intent to attend the 2002 World Cup conceptualized risk as a constraint on travel in terms of threats to health and safety if they attended the event.”
Segmenting Winter Sport Tourists by Motivation: The Case of Recreational Skiers (2009, methodology): “This categorisation has been applied to studies that investigate visitors' motivation ( Kim & Chalip, 2004 ; Kim & Prideaux, 2005 ; Yoon & Usal, 2005 ).”
Testing the effects of congruity, travel constraints, and self-efficacy on travel intentions: An alternative decision-making model (2012, methodology): “Past research (e.g., Kim & Chalip, 2004; Kim, Lee, & Klenosky, 2003; Zhang & Lam, 1999) has often separated the discussions of “push” and “pull”motivations, even though they have been studied simultaneously.”
International Sport Event Participation: Prior Sport Involvement; Destination Image; and Travel Motives (2007, background): “This finding supports prior tourism and event literature (Hanquin & Lam, 1999; Kim & Chalip, 2004) and illustrates how travel motives operate within the attraction stage of the PCM.”
Central place theory and sport tourism impacts (2007, background): “From large metropolitan areas to outlying hinterlands, public and private stakeholders are interested in adding the brand element of sport to their destination marketing profile as they view it as a means of enhancing their local economies ( Kim and Chalip 2004 ).”