Whose Innovation Performance Benefits More from External Networks: Entrepreneurial or Conservative Firms?*

By W. Baker, A. Grinstein, Nukhet Harmancioglu. 2016

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dae92644ef4c1e7f65490203d301872053334d06

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Alfredo De Massis
2. L. Uhlaner
3. N. Zahoor
4. Omar Al‐Tabbaa
5. David B. Audretsch
6. Nadine H. Kammerlander
7. Roy Thurik
8. E. Stam

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Alfredo De Massis
2. L. Uhlaner
3. Nadine H. Kammerlander
4. N. Zahoor
5. Omar Al‐Tabbaa
6. David B. Audretsch
7. Roy Thurik
8. David Urbano

In Strategy and Management

1. N. Zahoor
2. Omar Al‐Tabbaa
3. David B. Audretsch
4. Alfredo De Massis
5. Nadine H. Kammerlander
6. L. Uhlaner
7. David Urbano

Citations in the corpus

• Innovation with Limited Resources: Management Lessons from the German Mittelstand (2018, background): “Scholarly work on SMEs and innovation has established an important link between external networks and innovation (Baker, Grinstein, and Harmancioglu, 2015; Uhlaner et al., 2013).”
• Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions (2020, background): “Third, relationship-level antecedents dominate current research, where studies suggest that external collaborations can be beneficial for innovation performance due to access to different knowledge domains and exposure of decision-makers to different technologies (Baker et al., 2016; MartínezCosta e”