Exploring the Framing Effects of Emotion
By Robin L. Nabi. Communication Research, 2003
713 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dae02f765c7bbc6cf9c0cc9e27649adfb8fab870
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- L. Aarøe
- Derek D. Rucker
- James N. Druckman
- Brian E. Weeks
- Richard E. Petty
- C. D. Vreese
- R. Reiter‐Palmon
- Linda Bos
In Sociology and Political Science
- Sophie Lecheler
- James N. Druckman
- Dominique S. Wirz
- Derek D. Rucker
- C. D. Vreese
- Brian E. Weeks
- Charles Taber
- Milton Lodge
Citations in the corpus
- Affect and decision making: A hot topic (2006, background): “Nabi (2003), for example, experimentally manipulated affect (anger vs. fear) towards drunk driving.”
- Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation (2015, background): “Emotions have a powerful influence on political attitudes and behaviors (Brader, 2005; Marcus, MacKuen, & Neuman, 2011; Nabi, 2003), but might they also affect what citizens perceive to be political reality?”
- Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects (2012, background): “This has also sparked interest in news framing effects research; studies have shown that emotions are integral components of news frames (e.g., Nabi, 2003) and that exposure to news framing can cause an individual to have specific emotional reactions (e.g., Druckman and McDermott, 2008; Gross and…”
- Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice (2008, background): “9 Lerner and Keltner (2000, 2001) focus on fear rather than distress, but as they make clear, the same logic applies to analogous emotions like distress (i.e., in terms of their implications for certainty and control) (also see Schwarz 2000; Nabi 2003).”
- Partisan Provocation: The Role of Partisan News Use and Emotional Responses in Political Information Sharing in Social Media (2016, background): “Anger is an approach emotion that occurs when an injustice is perceived to have occurred and is associated with mobilization, taking action, and behaviors that seek restitution or punish others (Carver & Harmon-Jones, 2009; Frijda, 1986; Lazarus, 1991; Nabi, 2003).”
- Emotions Matter in Crisis (2011, background): “While a majority of previous research on news framing has focused on the framing effects on individuals’ thoughts, opinions, or evaluations in terms of cognitive processing, Nabi (2003) called attention to the media framing effects on the audience’s emotions.”
- Beyond Cognitive Framing Processes: Anger Mediates the Effects of Responsibility Framing on the Preference for Punitive Measures (2015, background): “Empirically, it is well established that emotions exert a strong influence on judgments (see for an overview Lerner & Keltner, 2000) and, as Nabi (2003) notes, it is thus plausible to assume that emotions are functionally equivalent to frame adoption.”
- Implications of Stealing Thunder for the Impact of Expressing Emotions in Organizational Crisis Communication (2013, background): “Emotions can serve as frames for organizational crises because they have the ability to guide the public’s information seeking and their evaluations of the crisis (Nabi, 2003).”
- The Influence of Anger, Fear, and Emotion Regulation on Ethical Decision Making (2013, background): “Alternatively, other research has shown that the situational control and uncertainty associated with fear has resulted in more situational responsibility for events and prevention-oriented (vs. punitive) goals (Nabi, 2003).”
- Compassion for climate change victims and support for mitigation policy (2016, background): “…are often conceptualized as a particular type of framing and frequently promoted as an efficacious strategy for persuasion (Dillard & Nabi, 2006; Nabi, 2003), few studies have directly explored their potential in communicating climate change; however, accumulating evidence suggests that…”
- “They Did It”: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication (2017, methodology): “The emotion words “tension”, “fear”, “afraid” and “pessimistic” were used as indicators of fear (see also Nabi, 2003).”