Governance and Governance Networks in Europe

By E. Klijn. 2008

478 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dab1495f492754d012ae9f016b01c9013799eded

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. J. Koppenjan
2. D. Levi‐Faur
3. S. Osborne
4. L. H. Pedersen
5. A. Moseley
6. E. Klijn
7. Jostein Askim
8. A. L. Fimreite

In Public Administration

1. J. Koppenjan
2. D. Levi‐Faur
3. S. Osborne
4. E. Klijn
5. L. H. Pedersen
6. Jesse F. Dillard
7. A. Moseley
8. R. Gray

In Strategy and Management

1. Jesse F. Dillard
2. J. Koppenjan
3. Crawford Spence
4. D. Levi‐Faur
5. S. Osborne
6. E. Klijn
7. R. Gray
8. Jostein Askim

Citations in the corpus

• Delivering Public Services: Time for a new theory? (2010, background): “Public Management Review has, I believe, been in the forefront of the development of public management theory both about the NPM (e.g. Chapman and Duncan 2007) and about public governance (e.g. Klijn 2008).”
• ONE-STOP SHOPS FOR SOCIAL WELFARE: THE ADAPTATION OF AN ORGANIZATIONAL FORM IN THREE COUNTRIES (2011, background): “Coordination problems have been recognized in several policy sectors and a range of efforts have been introduced to improve coordination between parts and levels of government (Bogdanor 2005), and also between networks of public and private service providers (Klijn 2008).”
• Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: towards a Single European Regulatory Space (2011, background): “While the literature often distinguishes networks from markets and hierarchies (Ahrne and Brunsson 2011: 6; Klijn 2008; Rhodes 1990; Sørensen and Torfing 2007) and tends to see networks as informal organizations, in the EU intergovernmental networks are increasingly being institutionalized and…”
• Governance network theory: Past, present and future (2012, background): “…and implementation Started in the mid-1970s with work on intergovernmental relations (Scharpf, 1978) and continues with analyses of new forms of management, including their effects and requirements Adapted from Klijn, 2008 Each of these traditions actually focuses on different types of networks.”
• Social Accounting Research as If The World Matters (2009, background): “(See, for interest, Ball 2007.36) What we are driving towards here are accountability regimes that are more actively normative (see, for example, Klijn 2008; Osborne 2008) and that perhaps start to look more like, and may indeed act in partnership with, (say) the better forms of journalism.”