Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism : A case study in robot-human interaction

By Ben Robins, Paul Dickerson, P. Stribling, Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2004

326 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da80cfc722893a96a92949a3dd5569966d5efbc5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Occupational Therapy

Citations in the corpus

From Isolation to Communication: A Case Study Evaluation of Robot Assisted Play for Children with Autism with a Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot (2009, background): “The trials were designed to allow the children to have unconstrained interaction with the robots with a high degree of freedom, and to build a foundation for further possible interactions with other peoples using the robot as a mediator ([8, 11, 16, 17]).”
Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism (2008, methodology): “Other uses of Robota include the study of joint attention [22] and also being used as a salient object mediating joint attention between four children [23].”
Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? (2005, methodology): “[51],[ 39 ],[36]). Furthermore, once they have become accustomed to the robot, in their own time and on their own initiative, they all opened themselves up to include the investigator in their world, interacting with him, and actively seeking to share their experience with him as well as with their ”
The Clinical Use of Robots for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Critical Review (2012, methodology): “Robins et al. (2004) also used a qualitative technique (Conversational Analysis on selected segments) to identify instances in which a performing robot could elicit joint attention and social referencing between a participant and a third interlocutor.”
Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction (2007, methodology): “Other fields can provide important input to HRI methodologies, but a range of novel methodologies are necessary in order to advance the field, and researchers in HRI have indeed started to take the first steps (e.g. Robins et al. 2004d or Woods et al. 2006a,b ).”
Robots for use in autism research. (2012, methodology): “In many studies, children with ASD interacting with robots show spontaneous joint attention behavior—for example, looking at an adult and back to the robot or pointing to the robot and looking at an adult or another child, with the intention of sharing some feature with that person (25, 30, 32, 35, ”
Title of paper : KASPAR – A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research (2009, unknown): “The humanoid robot Robota (Billard et al. 2006) has been designed as a toy for children and has been used in various projects involving imitation, interaction and assistive technology (Robins et al. 2004a,b; 2005).”
Interactive robots for communication-care: a case-study in autism therapy (2005, background): “Technologies of interactive robots [3], [8], [12] has not yet grown enough to make natural and unconstrained social interaction with people in everyday life; however, for people with communication disorders, our technology is certainly applicable to helping those people make their quality of social ”