Police Use Of Force And Suspect Resistance: The Micro Process Of The Police-Suspect Encounter

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Examining police use of force: a smaller agency perspective (2008, methodology): “Third, the analyses are based on just one agency, rather than multiple agencies like many of the previous studies (Croft and Austin, 1987; Friedrich, 1980; Garner et al., 2002; Terrill, 2003; Worden, 1995).”
Striking Out: Race and Support for Police Use of Force (2009, background): “…racial differences—such as suspect demeanor, physical resistance, neighborhood context, officer experience, and the supervisory style of police officials (Cao, 1999; Engel, 2003; Garner et al., 1996; Garner & Maxwell, 2002; Terrill, 2003; Terrill & Reisig, 2003)—are not included in all analyses.”
Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor (2011, background): “…disturbers, wrongdoers, and persons for whom complaints were received) and disputants (whose role of either suspect or victim is unclear, or may be both) were selected (Terrill, 2003; Terrill et al., 2003; Terrill & Mastrofski, 2002; Mastrofski et al., 2002; Terrill, 2005; Reisig et al., 2004).”
Police use of force: a transactional approach (2005, methodology): “While we have learned a great deal from these studies, we still know very little about the micro-process of the police–suspect encounter with respect to the use of nonlethal force (Klinger, 1995; Terrill, 2003).”