Police use of force: a transactional approach

By William Terrill. 2005

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bc2afdc6d5b2c18928363d25a72f4f06e2bca9e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. P. Bolger
2. Charles F. Klahm
3. R. Tillyer
4. N. Todak
5. James Frank
6. Ivan Sun
7. Mengyan Dai
8. Lois James

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Bolger
2. Charles F. Klahm
3. R. Tillyer
4. N. Todak
5. James Frank
6. Ivan Sun
7. Mengyan Dai
8. Lois James

Citations in the corpus

• Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor (2011, background): “…disturbers, wrongdoers, and persons for whom complaints were received) and disputants (whose role of either suspect or victim is unclear, or may be both) were selected (Terrill, 2003; Terrill et al., 2003; Terrill & Mastrofski, 2002; Mastrofski et al., 2002; Terrill, 2005; Reisig et al., 2004).”
• The Trauma Lens of Police Violence against Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2017, unknown): “In an analytic study of 3,544 cases of police–suspect interaction, one of five incidents that did not involve a resistant suspect, police officers escalated the use of force, highlighting that resistance is not the always the antecedent to police aggression (Terrill, 2005).”
• A Systematic Social Observation Study of Police De-Escalation Tactics (2018, background): “One way the literature has addressed this limitation is by examining the proportionality between the force used by the officer and the level of suspect resistance (Alpert & Dunham, 1997; Alpert et al., 2004; Garner et al., 1995; Terrill, 2001, 2005).”
• Just Following Orders: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of American Police Officer Use of Force Decisions (2014, methodology): “Table 6 (continued) Article Included Yes/No Reason for exclusion Number of analyses included in the analysis Friedrich (1980) N 1 – Fyfe (1988) N 1 – Gabaldon (2009) N 3 – Gallo et al. (2008) N 3 – Garner & Heraux (2002) Y – 1 Garner, Maxwell, & Heraux (2002) Y – 1 Garner et al. (1995) N 3 – Gau, Mo”
• UNDERSTANDING POLICE USE OF FORCE: A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE (2010, background): “This finding was also reported in several other studies (Lawton, 2007; McCluskey et al., 2005; McCluskey & Terrill, 2005; Terrill et al., 2008).”