Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems

By Amrit Tiwana. Information systems research, 2015

409 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Digital platform ecosystems (2019, background): “Up to now, digital platforms have been mainly analyzed from single paradigms such as economics (Jiang et al. 2018), technical (Tiwana 2015), business (Parker and Van Alstyne 2017), and social (Thies et al. 2016).”
Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model (2023, background): “Digital platforms can define the role of each partner and improve the sharing of partner skills and information, which will optimize the effectiveness of supply chain resource allocation and provide the possibility of diverse collaboration (Tiwana, 2015; Wareham et al., 2014).”
Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age (2018, background): “…platforms exhibit architectural and governance rules that seek to balance platform control with the necessary incentives for platform participants to engage with the platform and generate valueforoneanother(deReuveretal.2017,Ghazawneh and Henfridsson 2013, Parker et al. 2016, Tiwana 2015).”
Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature (2020, positive): “…either are atheoretical or emphasize “the-ory building” (e.g., Casadesus-Masanell & Hałaburda, 2014; Choi, 1994; Eckhardt, Ciuchta & Carpenter, 2018; Huber et al., 2017; Parker, Van Alstyne, & Jiang, 2017; Rolland, Mathiassen, & Rai, 2018; A. Srinivasan & Venkatraman, 2018; Tiwana, 2015a, 2018).”