Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Facilitating Understanding of Movements in Dynamic Visualizations: an Embodied Perspective (2011, background): “It is now relatively well-accepted that this view of cognition is at least incomplete because it cannot explain how symbolic representations are grounded when interacting with the world (e.g., de Vega et al. 2008).”
An Embedded and Embodied Cognition Review of Instructional Manipulatives (2014, background): “Drawing on insights from embedded embodied perspectives on cognition (Barsalou 1999, 2008; Clark 2005, 2008; de Vega et al. 2008; Hutchins 1995; Kiefer and Trumpp 2012; Lindgren and Johnson-Glenberg 2013; Shapiro 2011; Wilson 2002; Winn 2003) and state-ofthe art research on physical and virtual…”
Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition (2011, unknown): “The literature has used ‘‘amodal,’’ ‘‘symbolic,’’ and ‘‘linguistic’’ as antonyms for ‘‘modal,’’ ‘‘embodied,’’ and ‘‘perceptual’’ (De Vega et al., 2008).”
Linguistic Distributional Knowledge and Sensorimotor Grounding both Contribute to Semantic Category Production (2020, background): “…(i.e., statistical relationships of how words and phrases co-occur in language) are critical to conceptual representation and processing (Barsalou, Santos, Simmons, & Wilson, 2008; Connell, 2018; Connell & Lynott, 2014b; Louwerse & Jeuniaux, 2008; Vigliocco, Meteyard, Andrews, & Kousta, 2009).”