Blue ocean strategy.
By W. C. Kim, Renée Mauborgne. Harvard Business Review, 2005
2,489 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d99df3d8f6797910548a1a568d43a3ad2e5e6bee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Melissa Archpru Akaka
- Johanna Mair
- Heiko Wieland
- Stephen Louis Vargo
- Constantinos Markides
- C. Seelos
- Ramon Casadesus-Masanell
- S. Voelpel ‡
Citations in the corpus
- Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry (2014, background): “The integration of business model thinking in the virtue of open innovation seems to be crucial (Chesbrough 2006; Kim and Mauborgne 2004).”
- Profitable Business Models and Market Creation in the Context of Deep Poverty: A Strategic View (2007, background): “The first two cases in this paper reflect the ultimate “blue oceans" scenario - new market space where competition is absent (Kim and Mauborgne, 2004).”
- Understanding dynamic capabilities through knowledge management (2006, background): “Research has demonstrated that the creation of new customer value using the existing knowledge bases of the firm is a significant source of innovation and competitive advantage in many industries (Kim and Mauborgne, 1999, 2004).”
- Building corporate social responsibility into strategy (2009, background): “Here, by leveraging knowledge gained from target markets, target customer needs and the unmet social needs and/or social issues directly affecting those markets and customers, firms can explore the opportunity to change the competitive playing field, for example, by introducing entirely new consumer”
- The tyranny of the Balanced Scorecard in the innovation economy (2006, background): “…a collaborative value-innovation mindset, as illustrated in Table 1. external) internal value chain internal value systems Source: adapted from Kim and Mauborgne (2004); and Vargo and Lusch (2004) The tyranny of the balanced scorecard in the innovation economy: critical review and…”