Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating

By Rebecca Heino, Nicole B. Ellison, Jennifer L. Gibbs. 2010

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9808b1bb9df46f1b55e997636ff12e537df234f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Daria J. Kuss

In Social Psychology

1. Daria J. Kuss
2. Gabriel Bonilla-Zorita
3. Mark D. Griffiths

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Daria J. Kuss
2. Mark D. Griffiths
3. Gabriel Bonilla-Zorita
4. Zsolt Demetrovics
5. Kağan Kırcaburun
6. Jamal J. Al-Menayes
7. Joël Billieux
8. Halley M. Pontes

Citations in the corpus

• Online Dating and Problematic Use: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “Participants used many marketplace metaphors when referring to screening profiles, which were themed into five categories: (i) other market’s worth, (ii) own market’s worth, (iii) shopping for perfect parts, (iv) maximising inventory, and (v) calibrating selectivity (Heino et al. 2010).”