Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire.

By G. Devilly, T. Borkovec. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2000

2,109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d97092cd37c5865da0e48b30e6e30027192d4b4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. N. Titov
2. Matthew K. Nock
3. G. Andrews
4. L. Johnston
5. Genevieve Schwencke
6. Richard J. Davidson
7. Alfred W. Kaszniak
8. Isabella Choi

In Social Psychology

1. Elizabeth B. Holmberg
2. C. Ferriter
3. G. Andrews
4. L. Johnston
5. N. Titov
6. Genevieve Schwencke
7. Alfred W. Kaszniak
8. Richard J. Davidson

Citations in the corpus

• Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Preliminary Evaluation (2008, background): “Research by Devilly and Borkovec (2000) has shown that the CEQ has sound psychometric properties.”
• Clinician-Assisted Internet-Based Treatment is Effective for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial (2009, methodology): “Pre-treatment expectancies and treatment satisfaction Pre-treatment expectancies, as measured on the expectancy factors from the CEQ, were not significantly correlated with any of the outcome measure change scores.”
• Effects of Etiology on Perceived Helpfulness of Treatments for Depression (2003, background): “In the past 5 years, treatment outcome studies in which treatment credibility is assessed have been more abundant than previously (e.g., Devilly & Borkovec, 2000; Dowrick et al., 2000; Hilsenroth, Ackerman, & Blagys, 2001; Kazdin, 2000; Öst et al., 1998).”
• Coping with Cigarette Cravings: Comparison of Suppression Versus Mindfulness-Based Strategies (2011, background): “To ensure that participants in both study conditions viewed their respective coping strategies as being equally credible, the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly and Borkovec 2000 ) was administered at the end of the first study session.”
• CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer (2013, background): “All participants completed the questionnaire outcome measures (BDI-II, PHQ-9, K-10, CEQ, ERS and SDS) at 1-week post treatment and at 3-months follow up.”
• Randomized Controlled Trial of Web-Based Treatment of Social Phobia Without Clinician Guidance (2009, methodology): “Changes in the SIAS and SPS were considered the primary social phobia outcome measures, changes in the PHQ9, K-10, and SDS were the secondary outcome measures, changes in the CEQ were a process measure.”
• Parent Beliefs about Treatment Credibility and Effectiveness: Assessment and Relation to Subsequent Treatment Participation (2007, methodology): “Parent treatment credibility and expectancies Treatment credibility and parent expectancies for therapy were assessed using a modified version of the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ; Borkovec & Nau, 1972; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000).”
• Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Research on Mindfulness and Meditation (2015, methodology): “Credibility of interventions can be assessed using a slightly modified version of the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000).”
• Ready! Fire! Aim! The Status of Psychological Debriefing and Therapeutic Interventions: In the Work Place and after Disasters (2006, background): “While expectancy for change in people diagnosed with psychiatric disorders and attending treatment is sometimes related to actual change (Devilly & Borkovec, 2000), high levels of satisfaction with debriefing have not necessarily been reflected in positive outcomes (e.g., Carlier, Voerman, &…”
• An RCT Comparing Effect of Two Types of Support on Severity of Symptoms for People Completing Internet-Based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Social Phobia (2009, methodology): “Change scores for each outcome measure were calculated and Pearson product moment correlations (using Bonferroni corrected p) were subsequently calculated between these and the two CEQ factor scores to explore variables that may affect outcomes.”
• The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. (2010, background): “To our knowledge, there has been no empirical research on possible biological (Gold, Belmont, & Thomas, 2007) and psychological mechanisms such as expectancy (Kirsch, 1985) and credibility (Devilly & Borkovec, 2000) that might explain how VR distraction works to relieve pain.”