Research methods knowledge base
By William M. K. Trochim, James P. Donnelly. 2001
4,789 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Hyunsook Do
- Chris S. Hulleman
- Kevin R. Clark
- Sebastian G. Elbaum
- Gregg Rothermel
- Muammer Çalık
- Sebastian Baltes
- C. Wickens
Citations in the corpus
- Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures (2017, background): “Sensitivity to change refers to the extent to which test scores detect a change in circumstances [24].”
- How do Investors Judge the Risk of Financial Items (2003, unknown): “, that potential loss outcome does not influence perceived unknown), we provide evidence of both convergent and discriminant validity in our study 2 (Trochim 2001).”
- Applying the 3M Model of Personality and Motivation to Adventure Travelers (2012, methodology): “Trochim (2000) provided a succinct list of the steps required in constructing a Guttman scale.”
- The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: a comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system (2007, background): “Validity In a broad sense, validity refers to the principles we use to determine whether or not the research under question is of good quality (Trochim, 2002).”
- The Impact of Career Mentoring and Psychosocial Mentoring on Affective Organizational Commitment, Job Involvement, and Turnover Intention (2013, methodology): “By utilizing previously validated scales and conducting a confirmatory factor analysis (available from the second author), we were able to meet the requirements of instrument convergent and discriminant validity (Trochim, 2001).”
- Quality and effectiveness in Web-based customer support systems (2003, background): “But did the research study participants consider the customer support system separately from other 3 Although scales having more items often display higher reliability, it is not necessary to have more than two scores to determine reliability [76].”