CONSTRAINTS ON RELATIONSHIP FORMATION AMONG FEMALE PRIMATES

By S. Henzi, L. Barrett. 2002

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8cb04e3763a06290615b87355f5dcf42fa7db1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The size, composition and function of wild bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops sp.) mother–calf groups in Shark Bay, Australia (2008, background): “Demographic factors (e.g. availability of social partners and population density) also interact with grouping patterns to determine within-group competition levels and ultimately the social relationships among members (Sterck et al. 1997; Barrett & Henzi 2002).”
Social relationships among adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus) II. Variation in the quality and stability of social bonds (2006, background): “This led Barrett and Henzi (2002) to conjecture that relationships among female baboons are more like " business partnerships " than " friendships, " as females barter commodities that shift in value over time.”
Male chimpanzees form enduring and equitable social bonds (2009, unknown): “Another study, however, suggests that female chacma baboons, Papio ursinus, develop relatively weak, short-term bonds between themselves (Barrett & Henzi 2002).”
Time allocation and the evolution of group size (2008, unknown): “…1998; Shultz & Dunbar 2006; strength of social bonds, Stanford 1998; Henzi et al. 2000; Silk et al. 2003; the complexity of relationships, Hinde 1975; Foley & Lee 1989; Colmenares 1992; Barrett & Henzi 2002; Wey et al. 2008; and combinations of these, Crook & Gartlan 1966; Eisenberg et al. 1972).”
Patterns of coalition formation by adult female baboons in Amboseli, Kenya (2004, background): “Even the best-documented cases involve short-term exchanges of relatively low-cost commodities (Barrett & Henzi 2002).”
Social cohesion in a hierarchically structured embayment population of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (2009, background): “However, the strength of associations between females is likely to change over years as a result of variable interbirth intervals (Mann et al. 2000; Barrett & Henzi 2002).”
Cyclicity in the structure of female baboon social networks (2009, background): “The fact that very few specific female companionships persisted across consecutive periods of poor food availability highlights the vulnerability of associations to stochastic factors (Barrett and Henzi 2002), such as raised infanticide risk or maternity, that shift a female’s short-term social prio”
Behaviourally specific preferred associations in bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops spp. (2005, background): “Differences in reproductive timing (Barrett and Henzi 2002), calf mortality, and long inter-birth intervals likely result in a lack of preferred partner reliability through time (Mann et al.”
The Social Brain: Mind, Language, and Society in Evolutionary Perspective (2003, background): “…support from some species [e.g., gelada (Dunbar 1980,1989)], there is equally compelling evidence to suggest that interventions of this kind may not necessarily be all that common in other species [e.g., baboons (Henzi & Barrett 1999, Barrett & Henzi 2002, Combes & Altmann 2001, Silk et al. 2003)].”