Patterns of coalition formation by adult female baboons in Amboseli, Kenya

By Joan B. Silk, S. Alberts, Jeanne Altmann. 2004

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/278b0901b51375a8e8ae6f56e2255af2fadff371

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Social relationships among adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus) II. Variation in the quality and stability of social bonds (2006, background): “In contrast, cross-sectional analyses demonstrate strong and consistent biases in favor of particular types of partners such as close kin, females who hold adjacent ranks, and age mates (reviewed by Kapsalis 2003; Silk 2002a, 2005; Silk et al. 2004).”
Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba (2016, background): “In other species, female coalitions are generally used for female e female competition, to maintain social status or to usurp valuable food resources among females (Isbell & Young, 2002; Silk, Alberts, & Altmann, 2004; Smith et al., 2010; Sterck et al., 1997).”
Social relationships among adult female baboons (papio cynocephalus) I. Variation in the strength of social bonds (2006, background): “25) in agonistic contests at substantially higher rates than they support adult females who are not related through the maternal line, and they show smaller and less consistent biases in favor of more distantly related adult females (Silk et al. 2004).”
Grooming and agonistic support: a meta-analysis of primate reciprocal altruism (2007, background): “…al. (2004)/Myayo Papio cynocephalus Correlational Good F Yes Wild 0.079 Silk et al. (2004)/Omo Papio cynocephalus Correlational Good F Yes Wild 0.085 Silk et al. (2004)/Viola Papio cynocephalus Correlational Good F Yes Wild 0.440 Silk et al. (2004)/Weaver Papio cynocephalus Correlational Good F…”
Chapter 2 Reciprocal Altruism in Primates (2009, unknown): “Published reports remain contradictory; for example, Mitani (2006) and Schino et al. (2007) found reciprocal exchanges of grooming and support in Japanese macaques and chimpanzees, while Silk et al. (2004) found no significant effects in baboons (Papio hamadryas cynocephalus).”
Coalitions in theory and reality: a review of pertinent variables and processes (2015, background): “One prominent example involves female Old World monkeys, such as baboons, vervets and macaques, where females intervene in disputes between their relatives and unrelated individuals, typically supporting the former against the latter (Silk et al., 2004).”
Vocal alliances in Chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus) (2007, background): “In baboons, such bystanders are usually either close kin of the dominant aggressor or dominant to at least one of the opponents (Silk et al. 2004).”
Factors affecting individual participation in group-level aggression among non-human primates (2007, unknown): “feeding party size is the best predictor of whether a dangerous boundary patrol will form in chimpanzees (Mitani & Watts, 2005). In human children, Beneson and colleagues (2002) designed a study of behavioural responses to group size.”
The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups (2007, background): “Thus, dominant females sometimes gain priority of access to food (Barton 1993) and highranking matrilines are more cohesive than low-ranking matrilines (Silk et al. 1999, 2004).”
Factors Affecting Reproduction and Mortality Among Baboons in the Okavango Delta, Botswana (2004, background): “Similarly, in baboons (Cheney, 1992; Silk et al., 1999, 2003 ) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta; Berman, 1980) high-ranking matrilines tend to be more closely bonded than low-ranking matrilines and to support each other at higher rates.”
A comparative network analysis of social style in macaques (2011, background): “At the group level, affiliative relationships underpin various patterns of social life such as coalitions, collective movements or information transmission (Chepko-Sade & Sade 1979; Silk et al. 2004; Sueur & Petit 2008; Voelkl & Noë 2008).”