Cyclicity in the structure of female baboon social networks

By S. Henzi, David Lusseau, T. Weingrill, C. Schaik, L. Barrett. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2009

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Association networks in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) (2009, background): “This prediction is supported by the results of other studies: Henzi et al. (2009), using a network approach similar to the one used here, found that female chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus) associated in tighter and more connected networks when food was scarce than when it was abundant.”
Social network correlates of food availability in an endangered population of killer whales, Orcinus orca (2012, unknown): “For example, in a study on female chacma baboons, Papio hamadryas ursinus, Henzi et al. (2009) found that when food was scarce, associations became more polarized into both constant and casual associations.”
Animal social networks: an introduction (2009, unknown): “In a similar vein, Henzi et al. (2009) used a two-pronged approach to unravel details of the temporal variation in relationships among female chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus).”
The ‘strength of weak ties’ among female baboons: fitness-related benefits of social bonds (2017, unknown): “282 We have shown previously that baboons at De Hoop and the Drakensberg tend to 283 form only weaker social bonds during the season of food abundance, and both strong and 284 weak social bonds when food was scarce (Henzi et al. 2009).”