The Application of Referent Cognitions Theory to Legal-Claiming by Terminated Workers: The Role of Organizational Justice and Anger
By Barry M. Goldman. 2003
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8b93fcb08a89977676f9f693457afb9f020d25a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Brent A. Scott
- J. Colquitt
- T. Judge
- R. Ilies
- Russell S. Cropanzano
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Fred Walumbwa
Citations in the corpus
- Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. (2006, background): “In other words, aggrieved workers are often motivated to see the perpetrator suffer, which can lead to revengeful behaviors, even at the expense of one’s own instrumental benefit (Bies & Tripp, 1996; Bies et al., 1997; Goldman, 2003; Turillo, et al., 2002).”
- Employment Discrimination in Organizations: Antecedents and Consequences (2006, background): “It may be that the damage to dignity or self-worth that typically accompanies interactional injustice facilitates worker actions against the organizations (such as the filing of a discrimination claim; e.g., Goldman, 2003; Lind, Greenberg, Scott, & Welchans, 2000).”
- Just Feelings? The Role of Affect in the Formation of Organizational Fairness Judgments (2011, background): “, Folger & Cropanzano, 2001; Folger, Cropanzano, & Goldman, 2005) and that such reactions catalyze appraisals of injustice that can lead to volatile and potentially damaging behavior in organizations (e.g., Barclay, Skarlicki, & Pugh, 2005; Bies & Tripp, 2001; Goldman, 2003; Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2”
- Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: test of a multilevel model. (2006, methodology): “Although the two concepts are certainly related, research has distinguished interactional justice from the quality of leader–member exchange (Masterson, Lewis, Goldman, & Taylor, 2000). Nevertheless, future research testing AET would benefit from testing supervisorrelated events, beyond the more gen”
- Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. (2013, background): “In particular, a number of studies have linked the violation of justice rules to state negative affect (e.g., Barclay, Skarlicki, & Pugh, 2005; Goldman, 2003; Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2000; Rupp & Spencer, 2006).”