Head position as an indicator of producer and scrounger tactics in a ground-feeding bird
By Isabelle Coolen, Luc‐Alain Giraldeau, Myriam Lavoie. 2001
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d877833014cc898f9648ecf0054328c4639766fc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Mark J. Whittingham
- W. Cresswell
- S. Butler
- E. Fernández‐Juricic
- Nick J B Isaac
- Andrew J. King
- G. Cowlishaw
- Thomas Bugnyar
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Mark J. Whittingham
- Andrew J. King
- G. Cowlishaw
- E. Fernández‐Juricic
- W. Cresswell
- Nick J B Isaac
- Sasha R. X. Dall
- S. Butler
Citations in the corpus
- Ecological, social, and reproductive factors shape producer–scrounger dynamics in baboons (2009, background): “Experimental manipulation of the finder’s advantage has been successfully carried out in a number of bird species (Giraldeau and Livoreil 1998; Coolen et al. 2001, 2002 ) and also for capuchin monkeys Cebus apella (Di Bitetti and Janson 2001), but has not previously been tested under nonexperimenta”
- A new bio-inspired optimisation algorithm: Bird Swarm Algorithm (2016, background): “Individuals usually use alternative behavioural strategies, and choose between producing and scrounging (Liker & Barta, 2002; Coolen, Giraldeau, & Lavoie, 2001; Johnson, Giraldeau, & Grant, 2001; Koops & Giraldeau, 1996).”
- The effect of limited visibility on vigilance behaviour and speed of predator detection: implications for the conservation of granivorous passerines (2004, background): “Although 'head-up' periods may serve additional functions, such as scanning for conspecifics (Coolen et al. 2001) and handling food items (Illius and Fitzgibbon 1994), all models of antipredator vigilance”
- Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. (2005, background): “However, because processing graded information is relatively demanding [22,32], sensory or cognitive constraints are likely to limit the concurrent collection of public and personal information [ 33 ] and individuals might specialize on either type of information use [34].”
- Increasing the costs of conspecific scanning in socially foraging starlings affects vigilance and foraging behaviour (2005, background): “…Smith and A. Kacelnik are at the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K. 73 0003–3472/04/$30.00/0 2004 The Association for the S the role of conspecific scanning (Bekoff 1996; Treves 2000; but see Coolen et al. 2001), we concentrate on the latter effect.”
- Social monitoring and vigilance behavior in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) (2002, result): “Although not significant in the final multiple regression model, dominant monkeys spent more time vigilant than subordinates, which is consistent with the hypothesis that dominant individuals may be looking at surrounding group members for opportunities to scrounge or steal food items (Robinette and”
- The ontogeny of caching in ravens, Corvus corax (2007, background): “Looking at the cache with either eye is known to be crucial for orientation and spatial memory in food-storing birds (Clayton 1993b), whereas looking up during foraging has been interpreted as scanning the surroundings for predators and/or conspecific competitors ( Coolen et al. 2001 ).”
- Information transfer and gain in flocks: the effects of quality and quantity of social information at different neighbour distances (2004, unknown): “Estimating information gain based on head-positions could be used to assess the amount of social information necessary to make scanning and foraging decisions in groups or the relative value of personal and conspecific scanning under different ecological and social conditions (see also Coolen et al”
- Flock density, social foraging, and scanning: an experiment with starlings (2004, unknown): “, 1999; Templeton and Giraldeau, 1996; Valone, 1989), scrounging (Coolen et al., 2001; Giraldeau and Lefebvre, 1986), the opportunity for kleptoparasitism (Goss-Custard et al.”
- THE EFFECTS OF DOMINANCE ON SOCIAL FORAGING TACTIC USE IN HOUSE SPARROWS (2002, methodology): “frequencies of hopping with the head pointing up may be associated with the frequencies of a bird’s scrounging (Coolen et al., 2001).”