THE EFFECTS OF DOMINANCE ON SOCIAL FORAGING TACTIC USE IN HOUSE SPARROWS

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A new bio-inspired optimisation algorithm: Bird Swarm Algorithm (2016, background): “Individuals usually use alternative behavioural strategies, and choose between producing and scrounging (Liker & Barta, 2002; Coolen, Giraldeau, & Lavoie, 2001; Johnson, Giraldeau, & Grant, 2001; Koops & Giraldeau, 1996).”
Rank differences in energy intake rates in white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus: the effects of contest competition (2005, background): “The majority of these studies have found that dominant individuals have higher food intake rates than subordinates (Janson 1985; Benkman 1997; Robichaud et al. 1996; Saito 1996; Hino 2000; Koenig 2000; Harwood et al. 2003; but see Liker and Barta 2002 ).”
Insights for Behavioral Ecology from Behavioral Syndromes. (2008, background): “Alternatively, the producer–scrounger literature suggests that more aggressive, dominant individuals might rely relatively more on public information (generated by subordinates) about resources (Liker and Barta, 2002).”
Ecological, social, and reproductive factors shape producer–scrounger dynamics in baboons (2009, methodology): “For dominance relationships, we predict that individuals will scrounge more from neighbors of lower dominance rank than themselves (Liker and Barta 2002).”