Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images
By Guillaume A. Rousselet, Michèle Fabre-Thorpe, Simon J. Thorpe. Nature Neuroscience, 2002
352 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d873a28d377b4b27a48aa52a0b06d330371fe21e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Antonia Thelen
- Micah M. Murray
- Bruno Rossion
- Pietro Perona
- Aude Oliva
- Christof Koch
- R. VanRullen
- Li Fei-Fei
Citations in the corpus
- An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance (2013, neutral): “The mind accomplishes many tasks at the same time because there are a large number of mechanisms that act in parallel (Alexander & Crutcher 1990; Evans 2008; Fodor 1983; Minsky 1985; Nassi & Callaway 2009; Rousselet et al. 2002; Rummelhart et al. 1986; Sigman & Dehaene 2008; Sperber 1994).”
- Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli (2005, background): “Our human visual system is surprisingly parallel in processing the complex stimuli of natural scenes (Rousselet et al., 2002).”
- Diagnostic colours contribute to the early stages of scene categorization: Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence (2005, background): “'s results (Rousselet et al., 2002; Thorpe et al., 1996; VanRullen & Thorpe, 2001), no-go trials led to larger negative activities at approximately 150±200 ms following stimulus onset (Figure 3).”
- Electrical neuroimaging of memory discrimination based on single-trial multisensory learning (2012, background): “Rapid visual object discrimination has indeed been reported, with effects as early as 100 ms (e.g. Liu et al., 2009; Rousselet et al., 2002; Thorpe et al., 1996; VanRullen and Thorpe, 2001), and effects of image repetition have been documented as early as ~50 ms post-stimulus onset (e.”
- Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. (2006, methodology): “Earlier reports from our group suggested that the diVerential response starting at 150 ms after scene onset reXects high-level categorization processes (Delorme, Rousselet, Macé, & FabreThorpe, 2004; Rousselet et al., 2002; Thorpe et al., 1996; VanRullen & Thorpe, 2001b).”
- How does the brain solve visual object recognition? (2012, neutral): “, 1998) and 350 ms in humans (Rousselet et al., 2002; Thorpe et al., 1996), and images can be presented sequentially at rates less than 100 ms per image (e.”
- The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. (2005, background): “[26]) and since multiple objects can be simultaneously encoded via distributed neuronal representations [25], no diminution in performance is observed relative to the visual-only condition.”