Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats

By T. Setter, I. Waters. Plant and Soil, 2003

573 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8062f17b167467d6c3ae3b0f26c6c6f8018e9e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Improving Flooding Tolerance of Crop Plants (2018, background): “Barley is more flooding-sensitive than other cereals [91].”
The Critical Role of Potassium in Plant Stress Response (2013, background): “Waterlogging affects approximately 10% of the global land area [102] and is a serious impediment”
Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture (2011, background): “QTL have been identified controlling RCA formation in maize with potential application in breeding programs to enhance flooding tolerance in maize and other grains (Mano et al. 2007; Ray et al. 1999; Setter and Waters 2003).”
The Abiotic Stress Response and Adaptation of Triticale — A Review (2014, background): “Setter and Waters (2003) reviewed the possibility of improving waterlogging resistance in certain cereals and provided some views on the subject in triticale.”
Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments. (2009, background): “Setter and Waters 2003 ) and waterlogging can damage dryland species even when below the surface of the soil (Malik et al. 2001) or when transient (e.g.”
Photosynthesis and growth of winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages (2013, background): “430 Maintaining agricultural production in areas, where periodic waterlogging occurs, requires the identification of growth response of crops to waterlogging at different growth stages (Setter and Waters 2003).”
Physiological traits and cereal germplasm for sustainable agricultural systems (2007, background): “…and where genetic variation has been noted are: greater early nitrogen uptake (which results in a larger evaporating surface), osmotic adjustment (for more root growth and greater ‘sucking power’) and tolerance to waterlogging and fast recovery after waterlogging (Setter and Waters, 2003).”
ROOT STRATEGIES FOR PHOSPHORUS ACQUISITION (2008, background): “2006) also makes aerenchyma amenable to plant breeding, as is currently underway to enhance flooding tolerance in maize and other grains (Ray et al. 1999; Setter and Waters 2003).”
Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley (2014, background): “…Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina Soil is considered waterlogged when excess water saturates the soil pores (with a very thin—or even without—layer of water on the soil surface), inhibiting gas exchange between the roots and the atmosphere (Setter and Waters 2003; Striker 2012).”
Growth and physiological responses of six barley genotypes to waterlogging and subsequent recovery (2004, background): “However, high yield of some germplasm on recovery from waterlogged environments may have nothing to do with waterlogging tolerance, whereas highly tolerant lines may be discarded simply because they are low-yielding genotypes (Setter and Waters 2003).”