Growth and physiological responses of six barley genotypes to waterlogging and subsequent recovery

By Jiayin Pang, Meixue Zhou, N. Mendham, Sergey Shabala. 2004

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this study, the growth response of 6 barley genotypes of different origin (3 from China, 2 from Australia, 1 from Japan) to waterlogging and subsequent recovery was evaluated in 2 different soil types, an artificial potting mix and a Vertosol. A range of physiological measurements was assessed, to develop a method to aid selection for waterlogging tolerance. Plants at the 3 or 4 expanded leaf stages were subjected to waterlogging for 3 weeks followed by 2 weeks of recovery. Both shoot and root growth was negatively affected by waterlogging. As waterlogging stress developed, chlorophyll content, CO2 assimilation rate, and maximal quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) decreased significantly. The adverse effect of waterlogging was most severe for genotype Naso Nijo, intermediate for ZP, Gairdner, DYSYH, and Franklin, and least for TX9425 in both trials. Studies of the root anatomy suggested that such a contrasting behaviour may be partially due to a significant difference in the pattern of aerenchyma formation in barley roots. The adverse effects in stressed plants were alleviated after 2 weeks of drainage for all genotypes. In general, TX9425 continued to grow better than other varieties, whereas recovery of Naso Nijo was extremely slow. It is suggested that screening a small number of lines for waterlogging tolerance could be facilitated by selecting genotypes with least pronounced reduction of photosynthetic rate or total chlorophyll content, and for a larger number of lines, chlorophyll fluorescence is the most appropriate tool. Additional keywords: chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, aerenchyma.

Subfields: Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ed2bc1d936839f6b3e738a0590660fb6fc2e309

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley (2014, background): “Nevertheless, several studies showed a decrease in biomass production during vegetative stages with early waterlogging events (Malik et al. 2001, 2002; Pang et al. 2004).”
The State of the Art in Modeling Waterlogging Impacts on Plants: What Do We Know and What Do We Need to Know (2020, background): “One or two weeks after waterlogging ceases, root growth rates recover to similar rates as in the control plants, but the negative effect of waterlogging on shoots may last longer (Malik et al., 2001; Pang et al., 2004).”
Improving Flooding Tolerance of Crop Plants (2018, methodology): “After the screening of the Chinese cultivars [95,96,100], several crosses were performed to do QTL analyses for tolerance traits.”