Common and distinct factors in decision making under ambiguity and risk: A psychometric study of individual differences

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options (2008, background): “…two-color problem has been explained as either a process where the unknown probability for an ambiguous option is estimated and then compared to the known probability of the unambiguous option or as a process where the option with the most information is preferred (see Lauriola et al., 2007).”
The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research (2011, background): “Ambiguity can be conceptualized as “uncertainty about uncertainty” (Lauriola et al., 2007; e.g., the Ambiguity-Probability Tradeoff Task by Lauri-ola & Levin, 2001) or, more broadly, as a lack of suf-ﬁcient probability information (e.g., Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance by McLain, 1993).”
The Effect of Perceived Value in the Decision to Participate in Study Abroad Programs (2008, background): “Decision makers are characterized as either risk‐averse or risk‐seeking depending on their preference of available alternatives (eg, Lauriola, Levin, & Hart, 2007 ).”
Measuring the time stability of Prospect Theory preferences (2010, unknown): “Guiso and Paiella (2006) Eckel and Wilson (2004) Lauriola et al. (2007) Schechter (2007)”