Goldberg’s ‘IPIP’ Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland

By Alan J. Gow, M. Whiteman, A. Pattie, Ian J. Deary. 2005

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7ee05894b4a990e3ed58fdb188a6b20a7020094

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Bethany Liddle
2. Daniel Nettle
3. Colin G. DeYoung
4. L. Penke
5. Mark Schaller
6. Jaap J. A. Denissen
7. G. Miller

In Social Psychology

1. Bethany Liddle
2. Daniel Nettle
3. M. H. Clark
4. Colin G. DeYoung
5. Christopher Osterhaus
6. Susanne Koerber

Citations in the corpus

• Agreeableness is related to social‐cognitive, but not social‐perceptual, theory of mind (2008, methodology): “However, recent research suggests that instruments like the one we used, and even much shorter ones, have good external validity and capture much of the variation measured by longer proprietary questionnaires ( Gow, Whiteman, Pattie, & Deary, 2005; Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann,”
• Assessing the Effectiveness of a College Freshman Seminar Using Propensity Score Adjustments (2011, background): “Goldberg (1999) and Gow et al. (2005) have demonstrated that all five factors in this measure are both reliable (alphas ranging from 0.67 to 0.87) and valid.”