The Questionnaire Big Six in 26 Nations: Developing Cross–Culturally Applicable Big Six, Big Five and Big Two Inventories
By A. Thalmayer, G. Saucier. 2014
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7e29760ca22940ff7bcd1bf04b002fa5e505ad1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- M. Back
- Kibeom Lee
- W. Bleidorn
- M. Ashton
- Jaap J. A. Denissen
- C. Kandler
- B. Roberts
- Christopher J. Hopwood
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Personality trait stability and change (2021, methodology): “In many cases, these methods are not optimal in non-WEIRD Personality Science 2021, Vol. 2, Article e6009 https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6009 settings because of different communication and privacy mores, familiarity with ques tionnaires, and issues related to language (Thalmayer & Saucier, 2014).”
- Objections to the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure—and why those Objections Fail (2020, methodology): “…high Honesty-Humility pole: consider, for example, the Straightforwardness and Modesty scales by Costa and McCrae (1992) or the scales measuring the same constructs by Maples, Guan, Carter, and Miller (2014) and Johnson (2014) as well as the Honesty/Propriety scale by Thalmayer and Saucier (2014).”
- Young Adulthood Is the Crucible of Personality Development (2016, methodology): “We asked them to complete measures of personality traits, in particular the 36QB6, which measures the ‘‘Big Six’’ personality trait dimensions: extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, intellect, and honesty/humility (Thalmayer & Saucier, 2014).”