Diversifying approaches to research on athlete–coach relationships

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Application of Coach Leadership Models to Coaching Practice: Current State and Future Directions (2010, background): “Some suggestions to increase the applicability of these models is to further highlight the reciprocal interaction between coach and athlete, and set this within a given coaching context [8, 12].”
Expanding the Interpersonal Dimension: Closeness in the Coach-Athlete Relationship (2007, background): “The secondary goals of this study include adding to "relationship science" [1,2], utilizing diverse theoretical approaches that expand coaching science [3] and further understanding of interpersonal dimensions of the coach-athlete relationship [4].”
Examining coach-athlete interactions using state space grids: An observational analysis in competitive youth sport (2011, background): “Poczwardowski, Barott, and Jowett (2006) suggested shifting from a focus on the individual to the inter-individual, specifically coacheathlete dyads, as the central unit of study and diversifyingmethodological approaches in order to best reflect the dyadic unit and its functioning.”
The Role of the Coach in Facilitating Positive Youth Development: Moving from Theory to Practice (2011, unknown): “Qualitative methodologies have been promoted in coaching research to bring structure, understanding and a unified picture of phenomena that result from a complex reality ( Cote, Salmela, Trudel, Baria & Russell, 1993 ; Poczwardowski, Barott & Jowett, 2006 ).”