Drawing the PDB: Protein-Ligand Complexes in Two Dimensions.

By Katrin Stierand, Matthias Rarey. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2010

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d77ed4f87dd65e5f7a1e130dbb03543e8e1263cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. Philip E. Bourne
2. David S. Goodsell

In Molecular Biology

1. Stephen K. Burley
2. John D. Westbrook
3. Philip E. Bourne
4. David S. Goodsell
5. Christine Zardecki
6. Shuchismita Dutta
7. Andreas Prlic
8. Helen M. Berman

In Pharmacology

1. Philip E. Bourne

Citations in the corpus

• The RCSB Protein Data Bank: views of structural biology for basic and applied research and education (2014, methodology): “(b) 2D Ligand interaction diagram generated by PoseView (42) (dashed lines, hydrogen bonds and metal interactions; green line, hydrophobic interactions).”
• GPCRdb: an information system for G protein-coupled receptors (2015, unknown): “The receptor–ligand interactions can be visualized in a rotatable 3D structure viewer and schematic 2D interaction diagram implemented with 3dmol.js (http://3dmol.csb. pitt.edu) and PoseView (30), respectively (Figure 5).”
• The RCSB Protein Data Bank: new resources for research and education (2012, background): “For non-trivial ligands, a PoseView (38) interaction diagram shows which atoms or areas of the ligand and the polymer interact with each other, as well as the type of interaction.”