Measuring Attitudes through Priming.

By Bernd Wittenbrink. 2007

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d77031b619fa35b1f4bea1e5450042da1048309c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties (2010, background): “The logic of this procedure is that respondents will be systematically faster to identify words that are relevant to concepts that have been recently activated; extensive research in social psychology has demonstrated the reliability and validity of this measure of cognitive accessibility (Fazio 199”
The Dominance of Associative Theorizing in Implicit Attitude Research: Propositional and Behavioral Alternatives (2011, background): “A second associative methodology pervasively deployed in the measurement of implicit attitudes involves priming paradigms that target either the semantic or affective dimensions of evaluation (Fazio et al., 1995; Wittenbrink, 2007).”
Danger stereotypes predict racially biased attentional allocation (2008, background): “prejudice (Wittenbrink et al., 1997) had no effect on any of our regression models. N.C. Donders et al. / Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (2008) 1328–1333 1331”
Implicit measures in social and personality psychology (2014, background): “that it allows researchers to calculate separate priming scores for different kinds of associations that are confounded in the IAT (Wittenbrink, 2007).”
Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, background): “Wittenbrink, B. (2007). Measuring attitudes through priming.”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “Of course, in studies on subliminal affective priming, participants are not aware of the prime stimuli and thus cannot be aware of the fact that the attitude toward the primes influences their responses (see Wittenbrink, 2007).”