Do we really need more entry mode studies?
By J. Shaver. 2013
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d76c878b39d371492232da79b1a1a72d7e45ba54
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Christian Schwens
- K. Laufs
- Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra
- Sascha Kraus
- Tina C. Ambos
- Andrew C. Inkpen
- Aldo Musacchio
- L. Dau
In Strategy and Management
- K. Laufs
- Aldo Musacchio
- Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra
- Andrew C. Inkpen
- K. Ramaswamy
- Sascha Kraus
- Christian Schwens
- Tina C. Ambos
Citations in the corpus
- Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda (2014, background): “Hence, we do not “focus on sample setting – for the sake of sample setting” (Shaver, 2013, p. 25); instead, we focus on SMEs in order to enhance existing knowledge beyond what we know about large MNEs and to inform the overall domain of entry mode choice for future theoretical development and…”
- Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies (2014, background): “Once the location for the foreign investment has been determined, the focus shifts to identifying the appropriate mode of entry and the type of operations the firm establishes (see a review in Datta, Herrman, and Rasheed, 2002, and a criticism in Shaver, 2013).”
- Distance and Perceptions of Risk in Internationalization Decisions (2015, background): “International business (IB) literature is so replete with studies on location choice and international entry mode that Shaver (2013) questions the value of further research in this field.”