Boon or Bane? Others' Unemployment, Well-Being and Job Insecurity

By Andrew E. Clark, Andreas Knabe, Steffen Raetzel. Social Science Research Network, 2008

352 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The social norm of unemployment suggests that aggregate unemployment reduces the well-being of the employed, but has a far smaller effect on the unemployed. We use German panel data to reproduce this standard result, but then suggest that the appropriate distinction may not be between employment and unemployment, but rather between higher and lower levels of labour-market security, at least for men. Men with good job prospects, both employed and unemployed, are strongly negatively affected by regional unemployment. However, insecure employed men and poor-prospect unemployed men are less negatively, or even positively, affected. There is however no clear relationship for women. We analyse labour-market inequality and unemployment hysteresis in the light of our results.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d737b0c1f1b3d3173af4aa4e11a1c454c25373fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. David Bell
  2. Claudia Senik
  3. David G. Blanchflower
  4. Wim van Oorschot
  5. Heejung Chung
  6. Andrew E. Clark
  7. Michael A. Shields
  8. Nattavudh Powdthavee

In General Health Professions

  1. David Bell
  2. Claudia Senik
  3. David G. Blanchflower
  4. Andrew E. Clark
  5. Heejung Chung
  6. Wim van Oorschot
  7. Michael A. Shields
  8. Nattavudh Powdthavee

In Social Psychology

  1. Andrew E. Clark
  2. David G. Blanchflower
  3. Claudia Senik
  4. David Bell
  5. Wim van Oorschot
  6. Carol Graham
  7. Andrew J. Oswald
  8. Michael A. Shields

Citations in the corpus