Disseminating innovations in health care.
By Donald M. Berwick. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2003
1,925 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d70c20d4ba487817d2eb6ec99593a0510d293384
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Russell E. Glasgow
- Karen M. Emmons
- Gregory A. Aarons
- S. Horwitz
- Michael S. Hurlburt
- Enola K. Proctor
- Adrianne Feldstein
- Paul Estabrooks
Citations in the corpus
- "The human body is a black box": supporting clinical decision-making with deep learning (2019, background): “While engaging front-line clinicians, two established practices described above were utilized to promote trust: the ability to test the innovation and the ability to watch others try the innovation first [5].”
- Leverage Points for the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice (2004, background): “A perceived advantage serves to reduce uncertainty about the expected consequences of doing something new, thereby increasing likelihood of adoption (Berwick, 2003).”
- Beginning with the application in mind: Designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination (2005, background): “Uptake of health and medical interventions is more likely to occur if contextual factors such as incentives and support, organizational structures, and visibility are included ( 53 ).”
- Achieving Successful Dissemination of Empirically Supported Psychotherapies: A Synthesis of Dissemination Theory (2006, background): “Berwick (2003) notes that the curve that describes the adoption of an innovation has a tipping point, typically after about 20% adoption, at which the change acquires its own momentum.”
- Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America (2013, background): “This means the factors change based on the setting, the potential adopter, and time (Berwick, 2003; Greenhalgh et al., 2004).”
- American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. (2005, background): “Approaches should be chosen that enable innovative persons and early adopters of change and avoid placing blame on individuals.(81) Integrating new knowledge and behaviors into day-to-day pain management practice is a challenging but essential process.”
- Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors (2010, background): “They engage in ongoing education, usually follow the professional literature in their fields and are well-networked (Berwick 2003; Grol 2001).”
- Evolution of mechanical ventilation in response to clinical research. (2008, methodology): “26 ARDS 231 (5) 148 (3) 67 (5) 62 (4) 0.”
- How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. (2007, background): “Multiple, interacting reasons can be given for the general failure of health research findings to translate into practice (8, 51), including historical, political, social, economic, scientific, cultural, and organization factors that slow or impede transfer of research into practice (7, 51).”
- Handbook Of Design Research Methods In Education: Innovations In Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics Learning And Teaching (2018, background): “Several authors have emphasized this potential of purposive diffusion (Anderson & Jay, 1985; Berwick, 2003; Dearing, 2004, 2005; Lenfant, 2003).”
- A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. (2008, methodology): “Multiple aspects of the model are derived from work in diffusion of innovations,(9,17,18) social ecology,(19) the PRECEDE/PROCEED model,(20) and more pragmatic QI concepts.(5,10,13,21) This work provides strong support for considering the perceived relative advantage of adopting”
- Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda (2010, background): “The diffusion of innovation literature posits that the implementation outcome, adoption of an EST, is a function of such factors as perceived need to do things differently (Rogers 1995) perception of the new treatment’s comparative advantage (Frambach and Schillewaert 2002; Henggeler et al. 2002) an”
- Innovators and Early Adopters in the Diffusion of Innovations: A Literature Review (2017, background): “…of Griliches (1957) exploring the diffusion of hybrid corn, a plethora of studies have analysed the diffusion of innovations in a variety of contexts ranging from agriculture (e.g. Berger, 2001), to health care (e.g. Berwick, 2003) and information technology (e.g. Jeyaraj et al., 2006).”