Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A role in reward-based decision making
By G. Bush, Brent A. Vogt, J. Holmes, A. M. Dale, Douglas N. Greve, M. Jenike, Bruce R. Rosen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001
1,128 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7031a165d7a5f14be9ea944b76b10aff48992ba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Matthew Botvinick
- J. Cohen
- Olaf Sporns
- Brian Knutson
- John P. O'Doherty
- Michael P. Milham
- Hugo D. Critchley
- Nathaniel D. Daw
Citations in the corpus
- Effective learning is accompanied by high-dimensional and efficient representations of neural activity (2017, background): “Notably, the anterior cingulate cortex is thought to play a role in reward-based learning [17], while the visual areas V1 and posterior fusiform are involved in the representation of lower-level and higher-level features of”
- Performance Monitoring in the Anterior Cingulate is Not All Error Related: Expectancy Deviation and the Representation of Action-Outcome Associations (2007, background): “The ACC may act as part of a generic performancemonitoring system that is sensitive to a multitude of inputs (Ridderinkhof, van den Wildenberg, et al., 2004; Bush et al., 2002; Bush, Luu, & Posner, 2000), linked by their unexpected behavioral saliency (see above), which signal the need for adjustmen”
- A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. (2007, background): “Recasting the issue in these terms need not emasculate the central executive, because certain uncued task-switching paradigms still require endogenously driven task switches on the basis of error feedback, and there is evidence that these require executive processes localized to the medial wall (Bus”
- Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function (2007, background): “This study, along with others (Bush et al., 2002; Holroyd & Coles, 2002; Luu et al., 2003; Nieuwenhuis, Yeung, Holroyd, Schurger, & Cohen, 2004), suggests that the ACC responds particularly strongly to outcomes considered aversive or signaling reductions in reward.”
- Fitting decisions: Mood and intuitive versus deliberative decision strategies (2008, background): “Also, activation of the ACC has been linked with a drop in reward value (Bush et al, 2002 ).”
- Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus (2005, background): “So far, most studies of cerebral activation during acute noxious stimulation have not taken into account the fact that the ACC is involved in other functions unrelated to pain, which include coding for the reward properties of particular behaviour”
- Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. (2004, background): “After all, the outcome account addresses phenomena that seem difficult to explain in terms of conflict monitoring (for example, ACC activation relating to reward expectation [ 72 ]).”
- Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning (2012, methodology): “The RL-theory, on the other hand, provides an explanation for both the ERN and the FRN, and accounts for ACC responses to outcomes in fMRI studies (Bush et al., 2002; Paulus et al., 2004), and in single-unit recording studies withmonkeys (Niki andWatanabe, 1979; Amiez”
- Triadic model of the neurobiology of motivated behavior in adolescence (2005, background): “…regions play important roles in the control of motivated behavior, such as conflict/error monitoring for the anterior cingulate (Carter et al. 1998; Bush et al. 2000, 2002; Krawczyk, 2002), behavioral adaptation to changes in stimuli value as in response reversal for the orbital frontal cortex…”
- Optimal decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex (2006, background): “It has also been argued that the ACC S does not simply detect errors, but rather signals a change in outcome that drives changes in behavio”
- Functional connectivity of human striatum: a resting state FMRI study. (2008, background): “Our analyses revealed more fine-grained patterns of differentiation among ACC subregions than appreciated in task-based studies (Paus et al. 1998; Bush et al. 2000; Kiehl et al. 2000; Braver et al. 2001; van Veen et al. 2001; Weissman et al. 2004; Milham and Banich 2005).”
- Control of exploitation-exploration meta-parameter in reinforcement learning (2002, background): “A recent human neuroimaging study using a similar task also observed ACC activation (Bush et al., 2002).”
- A core system for the implementation of task sets. (2006, background): “…of performance feedback in a trial-related manner (Badre and Wagner, 2004; Botvinick et al., 1999; Brown and Braver, 2005; Buchel et al., 1998; Bush et al., 2002; Carter et al., 2000; Eisenberger et al., 2003; Gehring and Willoughby, 2002; Holroyd et al., 2004; Kerns et al., 2004; van Schie…”
- Functional neuroimaging of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and suggested future directions. (2005, background): “…al 2004; Zametkin et al 1990), and this is consistent with anatomic, connection, lesion, electrophysiology, and imaging data indicating that dACC is normally involved in higher-level cognitive processes, such as attention, motivation, response selection, and decision making (Bush et al 2000, 2002).”