Fitting decisions: Mood and intuitive versus deliberative decision strategies

By Marieke de Vries, Rob W. Holland, Cilia Witteman. 2008

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f1c0310d75b17633f4e6ab03101bbf68a719c5e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Andrea Ahlgrimm
2. A. Glöckner
3. N. Horstmann

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Andrea Ahlgrimm
2. A. Glöckner
3. N. Horstmann

In General Decision Sciences

1. A. Glöckner
2. Andrea Ahlgrimm
3. N. Horstmann
4. Cilia Witteman
5. T. Betsch

Citations in the corpus

• How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes (2009, methodology): “To determine whether our manipulation of Decision Mode was efficient, we analyzed individuals’ decision times (as done by De Vries, Holland, & Witteman, 2008; Finucane et al., 2000).”
• How Mood States Affect Information Processing During Facial Emotion Recognition: An Eye Tracking Study (2011, unknown): “Further, we expected participants in a happy mood to use a more global processing style (Hypothesis 2a) and a less local processing style (Hypothesis 2b) than participants in a sad mood (e.g., De Vries et al., 2008; Gasper & Clore, 2002; Schwarz, 1990).”