Understanding the impacts of Costa Rica's PES: Are we asking the right questions?
By A. Daniels, Kenneth J. Bagstad, V. Esposito, A. Moulaert, C. Rodríguez. 2010
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d702b2144606f7776903ba67d3d20685cb1794e2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Kristjan Jespersen
- M. Chapman
- Sarah Schomers
- B. Matzdorf
- Roy Brouwer
- R. Fletcher
- P. Pauw
- D. Raffaelli
In Global and Planetary Change
- R. Fletcher
- Kristjan Jespersen
- M. Chapman
- Sarah Schomers
- B. Matzdorf
- Roy Brouwer
- P. Pauw
- D. Raffaelli
Citations in the corpus
- Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica (2012, background): “Titled Pago por Servicios Ambimentales (PSA), Costa Rica’s longstanding program is commonly heralded as an exemplar of best practices, having ‘‘pioneered the nation-wide PES scheme in the developing world’’ (Daniels et al., 2010, p. 2116; see also e.g., Pagiola, 2008; Blackman and Woodward, 2010).”
- Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, methodology): “Our approach builds on work by Wunder et al. (2008), Daniels et al. (2010) and Pattanayak et al. (2010) but, by adopting a CAF approach, introduces a new means by which PES programme management interventions can be systematically appraised.”
- Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services (2011, background): “Costa Rican national PES programme 13 Drinking water supply and sediment reduction Private forest owners National government Daniels et al. (2010) Arriagada et al.”
- Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries (2013, background): “paying for services that would have been provided anyway (Sanchez-Azofeifa et al., 2007; Daniels et al., 2010).”
- Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability (2017, result): “This literature reveals mixed results with respect to endorsement of PES, where synthesis is hampered by a lack of established metrics for success (Daniels et al., 2010; Dougill et al., 2012; Prager et al., 2015).”