Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries

500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, background): “The importance of property rights (i.e. their distribution, allocation, and social embeddedness) for PES effectiveness is widely acknowledged (Lin and Nakamura, 2012; Schomers and Matzdorf, 2013).”
The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review (2018, background): “Coasean concept where externalities are best dealt with through private negotiations (Martin-Ortega et al., 2012; Schomers and Matzdorf, 2013).”
The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, background): “Two basic types of PES can be distinguished (Engel et al., 2008; Schomers and Matzdorf, 2013; Tacconi, 2012).”