DEA and Activity Planning under Asymmetric Information

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Returns to scale in different DEA models (2004, methodology): “See, for example, Bogetoft (2000) who utilizes an agency theory approach to link DEA to the planning of future operations.”
Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study (2004, background): “7 Informal suggestions of a DEA-based incentive mechanism had for example been made by Bowlin et al. (1989) in the context of budgeting.”
DEA and Dynamic Yardstick Competition in Scandinavian Electricity Distribution (2005, methodology): “Any deviations from planned output can be avoided costlessly by harsh punishments for deviations, cf. also Bogetoft (2000). min ßC2C b[c[C]]p(C) b; c(C) s:t: b[c[C]] ° c[C] + Ω(c[C] ° C(yjz; w)) ∏ 0 8C 2 C (IR) b[c[C]] ° c[C] + Ω(c[C] ° C(yjz;w)) ∏ b[c0] ° c0 + Ω(c0 ° C(yjz; w)) 8C; c0 : C(yjz;w))…”
On the Origins of Data Envelopment Analysis (2002, methodology): “Bogetoft (1994, 2000) has applied the DEA model in a 24 agent – principal game framework, where the unobservable true nature of efficiency can be concealed, and must be induced to be revealed by the proper incentive structures.”
Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services (2008, methodology): “More sophisticated methods for categorizing cost types include using economic models of agricultural returns based on observable characteristics (e.g., Bogetoft, 2000; Naidoo and Adamowicz, 2006).”