DEA and Dynamic Yardstick Competition in Scandinavian Electricity Distribution

By Per J. Agrell, Peter Bogetoft, Jørgen Tind. 2005

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97979f53d4cc68f0bc5961f0dcf5bf5ee89ef2a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Antti Saastamoinen
2. Timo Sipiläinen
3. Timo Kuosmanen

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Timo Sipiläinen
2. Antti Saastamoinen
3. Henrique Cesar Tupper
4. Timo Kuosmanen
5. Marcelo Resende
6. Andrés J. Picazo‐Tadeo

In Strategy and Management

1. Timo Kuosmanen

Citations in the corpus

• What is the best practice for benchmark regulation of electricity distribution? Comparison of DEA, SFA and StoNED methods (2013, background): “There is a large and growing academic literature on the application of DEA and SFA in the electricity distribution industry (e.g., Agrell et al., 2005; Cullmann, 2009; Forsund and Kittelsen, 1998; Hjalmarsson and Veiderpass, 1992; Iglesias et al. 2010; Jamasb and Pollit, 2003;…”
• Efficiency and productivity (2008, unknown): “(2004) Agrell et al. (2005) Edvardsen et al. (2006) Electricity generation Arocena and Waddams Price (2003) Korhonen and Luptacik (2004) Atkinson and Halabi (2005) Cook and Green (2005) Environment: macro applications Jeon and Sickles (2004) Lindmark (2004) Zaim (2004) Henderson and Millimet (2005) ”
• Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study (2004, background): “For a more detailed discussion on DEA-based yardstick schemes see Agrell et al. (2002) and Façanha and Resende (2004).”