Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations.
By Raphaël Guérois, Jens Erik Nielsen, Luis Serrano. 2002
1,685 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
- David Baker
- Yang Zhang
- Jeffrey J. Gray
- Tanja Kortemme
- Jianlin Cheng
- Robin Pearce
- Andrew Leaver-Fay
- Pierre Baldi
In Molecular Biology
- Yang Zhang
- David Baker
- Jeffrey J. Gray
- Tanja Kortemme
- Russ B. Altman
- Jianlin Cheng
- David B. Ascher
- Robin Pearce
Citations in the corpus
- Scientific Benchmarks for Guiding Macromolecular Energy Function Improvement (2013, background): “Many studies have focused on optimizing an energy function for a particular problem in macromolecular modeling, for instance the FoldX energy function was empirically parameterized for predicting changes to the free energy of a protein when it is mutated (Guerois et al. 2002).”
- Prediction of protein stability changes for single‐site mutations using support vector machines (2005, background): “The first three methods are similar in that they all rely on energy functions.(9) Physical potential approaches directly simulate the atomic force fields present in a given structure and, as such, remain too computationally intensive to be applied to large datasets.”
- Selection for Protein Stability Enriches for Epistatic Interactions (2018, methodology): “88 The models analyzed here are simpler, and less realistic, than other commonly used models for 89 protein evolution based on force fields [25], contact energies [26], or lattice proteins [27].”
- WS-SNPs&GO: a web server for predicting the deleterious effect of human protein variants using functional annotation (2013, background): “Thus, during the last few years, several methods have been developed to predict the impact of nsSNPs on protein stability [10-16], protein function [17,18] and to detect their pathologic effect [19-29].”
- A Web Resource for Standardized Benchmark Datasets, Metrics, and Rosetta Protocols for Macromolecular Modeling and Design (2015, background): “[15]; a set of 2156 mutants collected by Potapov et al.”
- mCSM: predicting the effects of mutations in proteins using graph-based signatures (2013, background): “Received on April 18, 2013; revised on November 12, 2013; accepted on November 21, 2013”
- Systematic Mapping of Protein Mutational Space by Prolonged Drift Reveals the Deleterious Effects of Seemingly Neutral Mutations (2015, methodology): “HaeIII ( PDB id 1dct ) [ 103 ] was first optimized using the FoldX RepairPDB function .”
- PoPMuSiC 2.1: a web server for the estimation of protein stability changes upon mutation and sequence optimality (2011, methodology): “We may distinguish the approaches based on statistical potentials extracted from datasets of protein structures [15-19], from those based on empirical potentials built from optimised combinations of various physical energy terms [20-23].”
- The PDB_REDO server for macromolecular structure model optimization (2014, methodology): “Additional validation is performed by pdb-care for carbohydrates (Lütteke & von der Lieth, 2004) and FoldX (Guerois et al., 2002) for calculation of the Gibbs folding energy.”