Port Privatisation: Objectives, Extent, Process, and the UK Experience

By A. Baird. 2000

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing port governance models: process and performance components (2008, unknown): “The qualitative and quantitative research that was conducted [2] provides evidence of a much greater range of existing/ potential port governance typologies than had been contemplated by previous authors [3, 4].”
The Governance Structure of Ports (2004, methodology): “Following on Goss’ (1990) suggestion that some port functions should be considered public goods and services, Baird (2000) noted that privatized ports actually invested less in development than the predecessor port authorities (Baird, 2000: 189).”
The drivers of port competitiveness: a critical review (2017, background): “In addition to this, Baird (2000) argues that port ownership structure has an impact on operational efficiency.”
Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals) (2005, background): “United Kingdom is the only country that has advocated and indeed practiced such a laissez-fair policy that involves the outright sale of port land, combined with a transfer of utility and regulatory function to the private sector (Baird, 2000).”
Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: an update (2010, background): “(2000) and Bonilla et al. (2004) on Spanish terminals, Barros and Athanasiou (2004) on Greek and Portuguese ports and Barros (2006) on Italian ports.”