Assessing port governance models: process and performance components

By Mary R. Brooks, A. Pallis. 2008

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccf48f7bac833d644e72f7be5401fa135d03220a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. A. Ng
2. B. T. D. L. Fe
3. Marco Ferretti
4. Eva Panetti
5. F. Parola
6. A. Pallis
7. Marcello Risitano

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. F. Parola
2. A. Ng
3. Alan D. Wall
4. Ana Rodríguez Álvarez
5. B. T. D. L. Fe
6. Marco Ferretti
7. Eva Panetti
8. A. Pallis

In Management Information Systems

1. A. Ng
2. F. Parola
3. A. Pallis

Citations in the corpus

• On measuring the effect of demand uncertainty on costs: an application to port terminals (2009, background): “Brooks and Pallis (2008) neatly summarize this with the following example: “….”
• The drivers of port competitiveness: a critical review (2017, background): “Surprisingly, except for a few attempts (Brooks & Pallis, 2008; De Langen & Heij, 2014; Vieira, Kliemann Neto, & Amaral, 2014), a “normative” 128 F. PAROLA ET AL. approach has been prevalent in the studies of the port governance reform, while an (empirical) assessment of its implications on port…”
• Port Governance Reforms in Diversified Institutional Frameworks: Generic Solutions, Implementation Asymmetries (2010, background): “This feedback loop (detailed in Brooks and Pallis, 2008), involves a transition period that may last more than ten years.”