Root Water Uptake: From Three‐Dimensional Biophysical Processes to Macroscopic Modeling Approaches

By Mathieu Javaux, V. Couvreur, J. Vanderborght, Harry Vereecken. 2013

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The process description of plant transpiration and soil water uptake in macroscopic root water uptake models is often based on simplifying assumptions that no longer reflect, or even contradict, the current status of knowledge in plant biology. The sink term in the Richards equation for root water uptake generally comprises four terms: (i) a root resistance function, (ii) a soil resistance function, (iii) a stress function, and (iv) a compensation function. Here we propose to use a detailed three‐dimensional model, which integrates current knowledge of soil and root water flow equations, to deduct a one‐dimensional effective behavior at the plant scale and to propose improvements for the four functions used in the macroscopic sink term. We show that (i) root hydraulic resistance may be well defined by the root length density but only for homogeneous lateral conductances and no limiting xylem conductance—in other cases a new function depending on the root hydraulic architecture should be used; (ii) soil resistance cannot be neglected, in particular in the rhizosphere where specific processes may occur that alter the soil hydraulic properties and therefore affect uptake; (iii) stress and compensation are two different processes, which should not be linked explicitly; (iv) there is a need for a clear definition of compensatory root water uptake independent of water stress; (v) stress functions should be defined as a maximal actual transpiration in function of an integrated root–soil interface water head rather than in terms of local bulk water heads; and (vi) nonlinearity in the stress function is expected to arise if root hydraulic resistances depend on soil matric head or when it is defined as a function of the bulk soil water head.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e45384cfa3be285d9d5ac8653e242d664b7fad86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

In Plant Science

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives (2016, background): “Only recently more complex approaches that explicitly describe the three-dimensional soil root system have become available (Hopmans and Bristow, 2002; Schroder et al., 2008; Javaux et al., 2013) and are not yet widespread.”
Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models: experimental and numerical analysis (2015, methodology): “…721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 58 59 interesting approach to RWU simulation would be to extrapolate the propositions of Couvreur et al. (2012) and Javaux et al. (2013) for the modeling of empirical macroscopic RWU models.”
Benchmarking test of empirical root water uptake models (2017, background): “…2008) increased the understanding of the mechanism of RWU as a non-local process affected by non-uniform soil water distribution in the rhizosphere (Javaux et al., 2013 Accordingly, a plant can increase water uptake in wetter soil layers in order to compensate for uptake reductions in dryer…”