The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity.
By P. Bech, N. Rasmussen, L. R. Olsen, V. Noerholm, W. Abildgaard. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2001
958 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d60b001c9081aec4e0a771e446aaa0d312a8f520
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Pharmacology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Academic performance prediction in a gender-imbalanced environment (2017, methodology): “This dataset was obtained through an online questionnaire and includes: The Big Five [11] (neuroticism, openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness), Rotter’s Locus of Control [18], stress [4], self-esteem [17], satisfaction with life [5], PANAS (positive and negative) [22], loneliness ”
- Tracking Depression Dynamics in College Students Using Mobile Phone and Wearable Sensing (2018, methodology): “…health specialists rely on depression screening tools (e.g., Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) [40, 41, 67], Major Depression Inventory (MDI) [7], Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [8], Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) [30]) and clinical interviews to assess the severity of the symptoms…”
- Measuring well‐being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF‐36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO‐Five well‐being scale (2003, background): “However, such a mixture of distress items and well-being items has become increasingly problematic because, on the one hand, well-being scales are now considered to be important dimensions of health-related quality-of-life instruments (Bech, 1995, 2001) and, on the other hand, depression scales have”
- Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians' diagnoses. (2004, background): “Due to the personal, medical and social costs of depressive disorders, a broader use of these screening questionnaires or other validated depression case-finding instruments represents a valuable component of comprehensive diagnostic assessment in medical patients (Meakin, 1992; Mulrow et al., 1995;”
- Gender Differences in Depression in Representative National Samples: Meta-Analyses of Diagnoses and Symptoms (2017, neutral): “…(Beck et al., 1961, 1996); DMI Depressive Mood Inventory (see Abebe et al., 2016); CDI Children’s Depression Inventory (Kovacs, 1985); MDI Major Depression Inventory (Bech et al., 2001); DTS Depressive Tendencies Scale (Alsaker et al., 1991); HDL-D Health and Daily Living Form- Depression…”
- Initial Challenges of Caregiving During COVID-19: Caregiver Burden, Mental Health, and the Parent–Child Relationship (2020, background): “94 [60] and in the current sample (α = 0.”
- Measuring Large-Scale Social Networks with High Resolution (2014, background): “The questions in the 2013 deployment included BFI, Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale [137], Nar-cissism NAR-Q [138], Satisfaction With Life Scale [139], Rotters Locus of Control Scale [140], UCLA Lone-liness scale [141], Self-efficacy [142], Cohens perceived stress scale [143], Major Depression Inventory [1”
- Job autonomy and psychological well-being: A linear or a non-linear association? (2021, methodology): “Here it must be noted, that the items of the measure of psychological well-being used in this study correlate highly with a clinically validated measure of depression (i.e. the Major Depression Inventory (Bech et al., 2001)), which highlights the relevance of the findings of this study.”
- The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (2010, neutral): “in our test questionnaire [41].”