Relating individual differences in attitude toward ambiguity to risky choices

By Marco Lauriola, I. Levin. 2001

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5f382be656258798516099bd58f38018ed3d28e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Decision theory under ambiguity (2012, unknown): “Liu and Colman (2009) study ambiguity aversion in a repeated game approach.”
Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues (2007, background): “…found in numerical reliance (Bartels, 2006; McElroy & Seta, 2003; Peters, Vastfall, & Slovic, 2006; Simon, Fagley, & Halleran, 2004), ambiguity (Lauriola & Levin, 2001; Nowlis, Kahn, & Dhar, 2002), preference for actions or inactions (Baron & Ritov, 2004) and the optimistic bias (Buehler &…”
The technostress trifecta ‐ techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research (2019, background): “They have a tendency to perceive difficult situations as threatening (Lauriola & Levin, 2001; Spector et al., 2000).”
Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. (2006, background): “Ambiguity poses a challenge for expected utility theory because people often prefer options with known probabilities to options with ambiguous probabilities, even when these choices contradict expected utility theory predictions (Becker and Brownson, 1964; Chipman, 1960; Heath and Tversky, 1991; Lau”
Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: an experimental study (2009, background): “As an exception to this general finding, Lauriola and Levin (2001) reported a positive correlation in the domain of gains and found that this was driven by the existence of extreme subjects in their population.”
Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Recent Literature (2013, background): “For instance Lauriola and Levin (2001) designed an ecologi-”
Ambiguity Aversion in the Field of Insurance: Insurers’ Attitude to Imprecise and Conflicting Probability Estimates (2007, background): “…normative Subjective Expected Utility framework predicts (Savage, 1954), there is much evidence that ambiguity affects decision-making in some systematic ways: decision makers are usually " averse to ambiguity " especially in the gain domain (e.g. Camerer and Weber, 1992; Lauriola and Levin, 2001).”