Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization

By P. Samuelson. 2004

736 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5caf8b76561b372281b3352f74a849cf0d31837

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

INTRODUCTIONOffshoring administrative and technical work: New fields for understanding the global enterprise (2009, background): “This questioning was provoked by the offshoring of higher value-added services (see, for example, Blinder, 2007; Gomory & Baumol, 2000; Samuelson, 2004).”
What Goods Do Countries Trade? A Quantitative Exploration of Ricardo's Ideas (2012, background): “This restriction is trivially satisfied, for example, in Dornbusch, Fischer, and Samuelson (1977) who assume that trade costs are symmetric across countries and identical across goods, dij = d k ji ≡ d.”
The politics and economics of offshore outsourcing (2006, background): “As Paul Krugman (1994) puts it in his insightful essay, “Ricardo’s Difficult Idea,” the root cause of the communications problem is the “implicit assumptions that underlie the most basic Ricardian model, assumptions that are justified by the whole fabric of economic understanding but are not at all ”
Offshoring and Directed Technical Change (2015, positive): “The potential negative effects of offshoring on incomes and/or the wages of less skilled workers in advanced economies (the “West”) have been emphasized by Feenstra and Hanson (1996), Deardorff (2001, 2005), Samuelson (2004) and Hira and Hira (2008), among others.”
Political Contestation in Global Production Networks (2008, background): “In 2004, however, the economist and Nobel laureate Paul Samuelson (2004) published a paper demonstrating that the United States would be hurt by trade with India and China if those countries improved their export performance in sectors traditionally dominated by the United States, such as software…”
Global value chains in a changing world (2013, methodology): “The APL method can be used to measure separately the upstream and downstream length of average production linkages. Updating the methodology proposed by Inomata (2008b), Figure 5.”
Channels and Policy Debate in the Globalization-Inequality-Poverty Nexus (2006, background): “For the contemporary version of the Ricardian trade model and possible effects of technological innovation in China on global trade flows, see Samuelson (2004).”
The Hyperglobalization of Trade and Its Future (2013, background): “20 Samuelson (2004) argues that the rise of developing countries such as China and India could compromise living standards in the United States, because as they move up the technology ladder, they provide competition for US exports, reducing their price.”
Elections and Discretionary Accruals: Evidence from 2004 (2010, neutral): “Even prominent economists weighed in on the debate (see for example, Bhagwati et al., 2004, and Samuelson, 2004).”