An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development

By D. Gerwin, N. Barrowman. Management Sciences, 2002

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Mechanical Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d54e95ac3547473defd916254fb28ee598cbf2e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Regina C. McNally
2. Morgan Swink
3. Jan vom Brocke
4. M. B. Akdeniz
5. Stephan M. Wagner
6. Roger J. Calantone

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Regina C. McNally
2. M. B. Akdeniz
3. Stephan M. Wagner
4. Roger J. Calantone

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. Stephan M. Wagner

Citations in the corpus

• Supplier traits for better customer firm innovation performance (2010, background): “, 2007) and require goal and task alignment, in addition to coordination on the organizational and project levels (Gerwin and Barrowman, 2002; Wagner and Hoegl, 2006), we created a five-item formative scale to measure supplier–customer homophily.”
• New product development processes and new product profitability: Exploring the mediating role of speed to market and product quality (2011, background): “Cross-functional integration is an element of integrated product development (IPD), a managerial approach to improve NPD performance through overlap and interaction of NPD activities (Gerwin and Barrowman, 2002).”
• Does Innovation Mediate Firm Performance?: A Meta-Analysis of Determinants and Consequences of Organizational Innovation (2004, background): “Key Words: Organizational innovation; Product innovation; Literature review; Meta-analysis; Performance; Organizational capabilities; Organizational structure; Organizational demographics”
• The Roles of Worker Expertise, Information Sharing Quality, and Psychological Safety in Manufacturing Process Innovation: An Intellectual Capital Perspective (2011, background): “…of a system for knowledge sharing in terms of design of team structure, location, the frequency of communication of coworkers, and supporting information technologies (Aletan 1991, Gerwin and Barrowman 2002, Hoegl et al. 2007, Nahm et al. 2003, Siemsen et al. 2009, Small and Chen 1995).”
• Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process (2009, neutral): “However, most striking is the fact that only 2 articles comprehensibly document the underlying search phrases (Gerwin and Barrowman 2002, p. 942, and Ngai and Gunasekaran 2007, p. 4).”
• Understanding Antecedents of New Product Development Speed: A Meta-Analysis (2010, neutral): “, 2002; Zirger and Hartley, 1994), as quantitative reviews have mainly focused on new product performance (Gerwin and Barrowman, 2002; Henard and Szymanski, 2001; Montoya-Weiss and Calantone, 1994; Pattikawa et al., 2006).”
• Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research (2015, background): “Gerwin and Barrowman’s (2002) review on integrated product development, for example, used a comparatively specific search string (“(performance OR schedules OR speed OR time) AND (projects OR sample OR teams OR tests) AND (product)”), while Ngai and Gunasekaran (2007) applied broader descriptors in ”